Menu

TRAGEDY EXPLOITERS WRONGLY CALL THE MENTALLY-ILL DRIVEN SOUTH CAROLINA SHOOTING AN ACT OF TERRORISM. OTHER TWISTED ONES CALL FOR A BAN AGAINST INDIVIDUALS OWNING GUNS.

So in the aftermath of the shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church  in Charleston, South Carolina, in which nine Americans were killed, many opportunists of mainstream media have wasted no time to exploit the event for political purposes. While most have called for gun bans in violation of the United States Constitution, many have done something far worse.

Stupidly, many are calling the criminal act an act of terrorism. Sadly, the president of the National Association of Colored People, Cornell William Brooks, in a thoughtless, reactionary manner said the incident is "an act of racial terrorism."

To believe Dylann Roof is a terrorist and to remain logically consistent, one must believe Adam Lanza was terrorist. One must believe James Holmes is a terrorist.

An ill-in-mind shooter who kills more than one during one incident isn't a terrorist. Those who claim this shooting as terrorism have engaged in rhetoric of the worst kind.

Terrorism means living by killing civilians in efforts to get civilians to pressure law givers into changing their policy or to get civilians to rise up and overthrow their law givers.

How is killing some Americans who happen to be black going to get blacks to rise up against law givers and force them to change their polices toward blacks?

Here are notable, actual terrorist attacks:
For any act to be racist, such an act would need to stop anyone from a claimed group from obtaining work or entering into contracts. That is the correct definition of racism. All other ways to talk of racism is done by racists themselves to mask their own agendas.

The biggest promoters of racism in exchange for power are politicians. Racism is a political doctrine. Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns anyone into monsters as they join groups.

Jim Crow laws were the misdeeds of racist law givers. The Dred Scott vs Sanford (1856) decision by U.S. Supreme Court robes was the misdeed of racist judges. Pace v. Alabama (1883) was yet another racist decision by the U.S. Supreme Court judges as was Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

Foolishly, many Americans revere U.S. Supreme court judges as demigods.

U.S. Supreme Court legal "scholars" universally hated Asians in the 20th century. In five major racist rulings, the revered Supreme Court robes ruled against the individualism of Americans who had Chinese or Japanese ancestry — Ozawa v. United States (1922), Korematsu v. United States (1944), Lum v. Rice (1927), Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), Korematsu v. United States (1944).

Law givers of Americans, especially those of the U.S. Congress are the chief instigators of racism in America. Congress engages in discrimination through laws that establish agencies to support all kinds of racism — subsidy for women-only businesses, education subsidy for so-called minorities, and so forth.

The biggest racists in America today are those organized groups such as the NAACP, NOW, Act Up!, and La Raza, each of which push for privileged privileges like quotas and subsidies.

Racism results in doling political privilege to those in favored groups at the expense of defenseless individuals who fail to belong to any organized group.  If any individual dare speak up about the duty being imposed upon him so political privileges as rights can get conferred to those of favored groups, that individual gets labeled as a racist by those winning the privileges.

Why does anyone seek political privilege? That is the real problem.

It is sad but predictable that those of mankind with political agendas go to great lengths through political theater to deceive the gullible and convince the gullible of all manners of things.

Every individual has the capacity of living by the Law of Love — do to others and loving one's neighbor as you would want others to love you.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. Individuals who join groups lose themselves and becoming cogs of the group, one of the mob, the crowd, who do wicked misdeeds in the name of advancing the group. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Everywhere you go, you can find the ultimate group, one based on territory and forced membership. It is to this group that all other groups appeal for support and protection. This ultimate group is forged by law givers, of course.

Since the recorded history of mankind, there has been no greater force of evil the earth other than that of law givers. The men and women of governments — politicians and bureaucrats — are the true mass murderers and manipulators of minds as they dole out crumbs of welfare in exchange for power.

The belief that mankind can get along as long as mankind continue to align themselves into groups stems from a childish rationalism and a grotesque idealism.

Such belief is false, thoroughly. People as group members do anything to push the survival of their respective groups. 

As far as the ban-the-guns angle many tragedy exploiters have taken, I have shown you in KILLERS IN AMERICA WORK SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, over half of all gun deaths are suicides.

According to the CDC, based on 2010 data, more people die from alcoholic liver disease (15,990) than from homicide by guns (11,078). Almost as many die from intestinal infections not classified every year (10,276) as by gun homicide!

Gun deaths that are not suicides account for not even 1% of population nor one-tenth of one percent nor one-hundredth of 1% of population. Gun deaths that are not suicides account for a scant three one-thousandths of one percent of population.

According to the CDC, based on 2010 data, more people die from alcoholic liver disease (15,990) than from homicide by guns (11,078). Almost as many die from intestinal infections not classified every year (10,276) as by gun homicide!

Total gun deaths in 2010 were 30,470, a number that has been falling for years in the face of a growing population. Of those there were a total 19,392 gun suicides. Suicides are 63.4% of all gun deaths!

Homicides by guns account for 0.0035056962% of the whole population and a tiny 0.44% of all deaths!

These numbers are so small relative to total deaths and total population as to be rounding errors. Death by homicide by gun is statistically insignificant in the face of all deaths.

The real killers are heart disease and cancer, which together account for more than half of all deaths (54.9%).

The biggest killer of them all are women who engage in abortion. At 765,651 killed by abortion, by far, abortion was the leading cause of death in the USA in 2010, besting cardiovascular diseases not counting heart stoppage (600,385), cancers (574,743), heart stoppage (179,828), and all accidents (120,859).

Almost every of the 780,213 deaths caused by cardiovascular disease and almost every of the 574,743 deaths caused by cancer and almost every of the 138,080 deaths caused by lower respiratory disease never gets reported on your local six o'clock news. And no one in mainstream media talks about the monthly abortion body count.