Tuesday, March 21, 2017


Yesterday, during the senate hearing on Neil Gorsuch as a Supreme Court nominee, dopey Diane Feinstein, one of the two dopey senators from California had this to say:

"Judge Gorsuch has stated that he believes judges should look to the original public meaning of the Constitution when they decide what a provision of the Constitution means. This is personal, but I find this originalist judicial philosophy to be really troubling. In essence, it means the judges and courts should evaluate our constitutional rights and privileges as they were understood in 1789.
"However, to do so, would not only ignored the intent of the framers, that the Constitution would be a framework on which to build, but it severely limit the genius of what our Constitution upholds. I firmly believe the American Constitution is a living document, intended to evolve as our country evolves.
"In 1789, a population of the United States was under 4 million. Today, we’re 325 million and growing. At the time of our founding, African-Americans were enslaved. It was not so long after women had been burned at the stake for witchcraft, and the idea of an automobile, let alone the Internet, was unfathomable.
"In fact, if we were to dogmatically adhere to originalist interpretations, then we would still have segregated schools and bans on interracial marriage, women wouldn’t be entitled to equal protection under the law, and government discrimination against LGBT Americans would be permitted. So I am concerned when I hear that Judge Gorsuch is an originalist and a strict constructionist."

The Constitution of United States of American is a body of rules. The Framers organized the entire original Constitution into seven articles. After the Preamble, the first four articles deal with the organization of federal form of government and the limited power (authority and capacity) of each aspect of that government:

  • Legislative Branch (Article 1)
  • Executive Branch which includes the President (Article 2)
  • the Judicial Branch, which includes the Supreme Court (Article 3)
  • the States (Article 4). 
Article 6 decrees all debts against Congress as valid; the Constitution will be the supreme law of the land and that all members of government both at the federal and state levels must be sworn by oath to uphold the Constitution and that all are free from a religious test to hold office. Article 7 describes the Ratification process.

Because the Framers had such insight, the Framers gave us Article 5. Article 5 describes the Amendment process. Having an amendment process makes the Constitution mutable.

It was through Article 5 that Americans gained our Bill of Rights. The first ten amendments comprise the Bill of Rights. The first ten amendments define the rights each individual has and the duties Congress has with respect to those rights.

With the foregoing in mind, let's compare what dopey Diane said to reality.

Dopey Diane: "In essence, [originalist judicial philosophy] means the judges and courts should evaluate our constitutional rights and privileges as they were understood in 1789."


1. There are no such things as privileges under law. Law is the absence of freedom. Every law has a duty and matching right, a right and a matching duty.

2. Originalism, or as dopey Diane said originalist judicial philosophy, means the Constitution must be read with the definition of the words comprising any sentence as understood by most persons who lived at the time of the writing of the Constitution.

Legal concepts as all concepts are invariant. A language can change. A foreign language can be spoken to describe a concept, but the concept never changes. A oak tree is the same concept in any language. Murder is the same concept in any language.

Further, a review of works from the 1850s, the 1890s and even the 1920s, reveals that our legal concepts today are the same as those which arose through the centuries of Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Norman law.

The United States Constitution is quite a simple document. The writers spoke and wrote Modern English. So do we.

Dopey Diane: "However, to do so, would not only ignored the intent of the framers, that the Constitution would be a framework on which to build ..."

Reality: The Framers provided the way to build the constitution up, if need be. That way is the amendment as they described in Article 5:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Dopey Diane: "I firmly believe the American Constitution is a living document, intended to evolve as our country evolves."

Reality: Would-be despots like Dopey Diane believe in the ends justify the means. In short, evil ones like Dopey Diane would like to interpret any passage of the Constitution in the ways needed to achieve their ends.

That is what the Living Constitution, aka loose constructionism, aka living document, means. Any day of the week, given a new end, regardless of how injurious or nefarious, under a living document, what once was restricted by the constitution merely could be interpreted anew so as to accomplish the ends.

Again, the Framers provided the way to get the preferred ends, if need be. That way is to amend the Constitution as the Framers described in Article 5.

The whole point of having a firm constitution with an amendment process is to deny despots the chance to rise to power, overthrow the government and instill themselves as dictators.

Dopey Diane: "... African-Americans were enslaved ... women had been burned at the stake for witchcraft ... if we were to dogmatically adhere to originalist interpretations, then we would still have segregated schools and bans on interracial marriage, women wouldn’t be entitled to equal protection under the law, and government discrimination against LGBT Americans would be permitted."

Reality: Because of the means the Framers gave us the means to change our Constitution, Article 5,  as Americans have evolved in morality, Americans have amended the Constitution. So with the 13th Amendment, Americans banned slavery. With the 14th Amendment, Americans provided for equal protection.

Read more ...
Blogger Tricks

Monday, March 20, 2017


Today, during the hearing by the Senate Judiciary Committee Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, Senator Pat Leahy (D-VT) stated that Gorsuch is “a president who lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes.”

Like so many dopes, Leahy trots out the bogus national popular vote argument. There isn't a national popular vote.

In reality, President Trump won the required popular vote. President Trump was so popular in most states that he won the presidency. President Trump was most popular in 30 states of 50 states.

President Trump was not popular in only a handful of states, the immigrant states of Hawaii, California, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, as well as Vermont.

Though President Trump didn't carry these states, his popularity was nearly as close as Clinton's: New Hampshire (46.5% vs 46.8%), Minnesota (46.5% vs 47.2%), Nevada (45.5% vs 47.9%), Maine (44.9% vs 47.8%), Virginia (46.2% vs 49.8%), Colorado (43.3% vs 48.2%).

President Trump was fairly popular in New Mexico (40% vs 48.3%) relative to Clinton, a state where 9% of voters voted for the right-wing libertarian candidate, Gary "What's Aleppo?" Johnson.

Even in a state like New York, President Trump was not popular only in the the bigger city counties: Erie (Buffalo), Monroe (Rochester), Onondaga (Syracuse), Albany (Albany), Schenectady (Schenectady), Columbia (Kingston); the New York City counties of Bronx, New York (Manhattan), Kings (Brooklyn), Queens; the immigrant counties around NYC: Nassau, Westchester, Rockland; the hippy county of Ulster and the lower tier Appalachia county of Tompkins.

President Trump managed to carry 45 counties of New York including the heavily populated Richmond (Staten Island) and the rich county of Suffolk on Long Island.
Read more ...

Thursday, March 16, 2017


Paul Ryan, UniParty Republicans and Big Medical Bills Insurers are betting that you are too stupid to understand what they are doing and that you too stupid to understand how insurance works.

Having a mandated penalty surcharge goes against competition. The purpose of it is to reduce churn, which means Big Med Insurers will not need to compete to keep you as a customer.

Insurance doesn't cover the past. Insurance exists to cover losses that might happen in an unknown future.

Having insurance long ago that has since been discontinued fails to prevent future losses.

Anyone who knows the risk game looks at the situation at the moment and then decides to risk not earning as much for administering insurance because losses will be realized.

People are under this foolish belief that insurers pay claims from their stash. The source of funds for paying claims come from others who are insured. Insurers increase their handle by paying fewer claims and by estimating accurately actual losses in the future.

A surcharge mandate means those running the insurance either are too stupid to know how to gauge the future based on actuarial science or are using politics to get a law passed that gives them windfall profits.

Americans need to oppose RyanCare and demand a full repeal of ObamaCare. Americans need real insurance restored — risk pools based on sex, race, height, weight, age, blood pressure.
Read more ...

Monday, March 13, 2017


"Donald Trump is a fascist." ~ Michael Kinsley, Washington Post,  December 9, 2016
"Donald Trump is also a fascist authoritarian..." ~ Chauncey Devega, Salon, January 21, 2017 
"Whether or not we want to call Trump a fascist outright, then, it seems fair to say that he’s closer to the “proto-fascist..." ~ Ross Douthat, New York Times, December 3, 2015
"Donald Trump Is a fascist. This isn’t a partisan attack. It is the political label that best describes what the GOP front-runner has become." ~ Jamelle Bouie, Slate, November 25, 2015 

The above quotes reveal exactly why Americans rightly see the Establishment's media as fake news. People can change what words they use to label concepts. However, concepts are invariant regardless of what words or what language gets used to define concepts.

Fascism means big industry led by the biggest firms doing the bidding of government whereby the firms still get to profit and have property in capital (property put to production; property means right of ownership).

Under fascism, individuals can pursue profit with their property in chattel, works and promises.

Full fascism requires conquest of other peoples and their territories. So the Mussolini Italian conquest of the Ethiopians, the Nazi conquest of the Poles and the Japanese conquest of the Chinese in Manchuria revealed full fascism at work.

Socialism means living by no property in capital by individuals and no pursuit of profit by individuals. There is only collective capital. The division of labor arises from rules laid down by those with power to make the rules.

Under Full Socialism is the condemnation of private ownership of capital. The state becomes the sole employer.

Communism means living by no property in capital by individuals, no pursuit of profit by individuals and no property in possessions by individuals.

So Communism is Full Socialism with the enforcers of the state having the power to take away anyone's possessions to give to anyone else if deemed needed under the rhetoric of the greater good. Possessions are mere utilities.

The key features of fascism are government, militarism and private ownership. The key features of communism are government, militarism and no private ownership. Both fascism and communism are anti-civilization as civilization means rule through laws and not through force.

Militarism isn't a feature of socialism. Militarism is a must with communism and fascism.

Fascism, communism and socialism rely upon collectivist rhetoric, which claims that action undertaken by government is done to achieve national objectives. In all three, the individual becomes a mere implement to achieve national objectives.

Here in the USA, Obamacare is a example of quasi-fascism, quasi-communism in action. Those with employer-managed insurance pay massive premiums for low-wage, low-skill workers to have mostly free insurance. That is the communism bit. Big Insurance does the bidding of government to get the low-skilled covered. That is the fascism bit.
Read more ...

Friday, March 10, 2017


For years, the GOP were the Gutless Opposition Party. Now that Republicans have power, they are gutless still.

Winning American voters did not vote the GOPhers into office so they would seek consensus with the Democrats. Winning voting Americans expect the longtime Gutless Opposition Party to rule by by conviction.

Under the Speaker of the House and Uniparty leader, Paul Ryan, the gutless Republicans have put forth RyanCare (American Health Care Act) as the so-called replacement of ObamaCare. RyanCare changes little for Americans.


ObamaCare is a mixed expression of fascism and Marxism. The fascism part of ObamaCare has big firms doing the bidding of government while maintaining capital (property put to production) and property in profits. The Marxism part of ObamaCare — from each according to his ability to each according to their needs — forces everyone into the same payment pool though everyone does not have the same risks. As well, ObamaCare forces  many to pay the full freight twice — in higher premiums and taxes to Congress to fund subsidies.

The Democrats and Big Med Insurers premised ObamaCare on this:

Americans with OK priced medical bills paying insurance administered by their employers would see a substantial rise in premiums and deductibles to pay for

  1. the insurance for those whose low-skill jobs don't pay benefits 
  2. females recreational sex pregnancy control products (pills, diaphrams)
  3. ongoing medical bills incurred because many have made themselves obese 
  4. ongoing medical bills incurred for those already diagnosed with a chronic disease

To get Americans to suck it up, the Dems tricked Americans into the benefit of adding one's child to one's policy up to age 26, which means a windful of added premium collected since most ages 21 to 26 never need expensive medicine.

RyanCare changes none of ObamaCare in principle. What RyanCare does is remove taxes to be levied on medical device makers and others needed to expand borrowing to cover expansion of Medicaid.

The concept of insurance is not restored with RyanCare because risk pools based on age, sex, race and the presence of birth defects and chronic disease are not restored. This is the worst crime of RyanCare.

Paul Ryan and the gutless Republicans would like us to accept their changes in three steps.

  1. Step One removes the mandate to pay a fine to Congress, wrongly ruled a tax by Chief Justice Roberts, with a penalty paid to insurers.
  2. Step Two has HHS Secretary muck with regulations.
  3. Step Three has a promise of getting future changes passed in a future bill.
Winning voting Americans only can rely upon results. Winning voting Americans can not rely upon promises that Tom Price will regulate to force competition in Step Two. Even if Price regulates in Step Two, should Trump or Pence lose in 2020, Dems could regulate back into existence everything Price changed.  As well, winning voting Americans can not rely on Congress passing other things in Step Three. Any bill in the Senate still faces a filibuster. So Step Three is pipe-dreaming.


This is not a repeal of Obamacare. This is merely AltObamaCare.

RyanCare is merely a protectionist bill for Big Med Insurers.  People at the top hate competition. They fear it.

Yes, it is true. Through Obamacare, most of the smaller firms have been run out of the competition already. However, the Big Medical Bills Insurers remaining are using politics to keep a law, which lets them keep unearned profits. RyanCare is anti-competitive, anti-free enterprise, anti-free markets. 


Congress spends $6.50 of every $10 spent on medicine and medical practices in the USA. Congress alone sets the price for all medical procedures for which it pays. Congress outbids all would-be customers of medicine.

Medical bills insurers are forced to match the prices Congress decrees. So too are out-of-pocket payers.

Congress is the sole reason why prices have gone up.

To reduce the prices that Congress pays requires greater efficiency in medical products production. That can be achieved only when the various medical oligopoly markets get broken up and protectionism for firms and individuals involved in medicine get removed.


Insurance exists to cover losses when it is expected a loss will happen to someone in a group but no one in the group knows which one. True insurance creates risk pools. True insurance works like this:

  1. There will be losses incurred by some in a group of many.
  2. No one knows which ones will befallen by loss.
  3. All form a group to pay into a pot from which those few of the many who have losses get covered.
  4. High-risk go into high-risk pools and pay more — the chronic fat, needle druggies, etc.
  5. Low-risk go into low-risk pools and pay less — the fit.
Actuarial risks for Americans at every age and sex for every disease are well known. Based on weight, height and blood pressure alone, doctors can predict the longevity of any individual and the prevalence of specific diseases. Actuaries already know the disease incidence for the population by age in any calendar year within a tolerance range of plus or minus so much percent.

Insurance isn't supposed to be a credit card with someone else picking up the monthly payment. Insurance exists to pay claims for losses when it is expected someone is going to incur a catastrophic loss but when no one knows who is going to be the actual loser. True Insurance requires a group of individuals each who face the same danger with something alike at risk.

As a fit adult male, why should I pay for risks that never will befall me — female reproductive organ diseases, childhood diseases, race-specific diseases of colored-races, congenital defect diseases, pregnancy, druggie-induced diseases, HIV/AIDS?

Why should I pay for those who have been diagnosed with the onset of a chronic disease? Why should I pay for those who are obese, chronically overweight and unfit? Why should I pay for abortion (birth control), pregnancy control (condoms, pills, diaphrams), cosmetic surgery, sex changes?


Some advocate for Health Savings Accounts (HSA), which would work as a tax free reserve for expenses.  But why go through all that rigmarole? True Insurance exists as the risk mechanism to cover losses of unexpected expenses.

Let people keep their property more of their profit (income after expenses). Just decree that no one should pay more than 12% of his income to Congress in any year.


Why 4 or 5 levels of plans? That is so mid-20th century thinking. In the Age of Computers and the Age of Human Genome, every policy should be individualized based on what the individual believes are his greatest potential dangers that could give rise to loss or death in untreated.


The fix is to be found on a heading 180 degrees from what they are proposing. That fix is hyper-competition and free enterprise. The fix begins with full repeal.

Repeal is done thus: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is hereby repealed.

Repeal can happen today, right now. Repeal does not depend upon replace. Repeal gives the Republicans leverage.

Replace can happen when greed (getting something for nothing) gets drained from the system. Repeal gives leverage to get the Dems to compromise on replace. An attempt at partial repeal and partial replace with a bunch of future hopes strips away all leverage.


  1. Repeal Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) outright. 
  2. Restore the concept of True Insurance with risk pools for as many known actuarial realities any individual faces based on height, weight, age, blood pressure, VO2 maximum, race, the presence or absence of chronic disease.
  3. Congress could pay outright in full for medicine for crippleds.
  4. Congress could pay for disease-fighting medicine and injury-medicine for those on TANF.
  5. Force "pre-existing" to pay much higher premiums for related by as of yet to be diagnosed illnesses. If they are already in the throes of their chronic disease, their loss is not unexpected. 
  6. Force the high-risk ones to pay more, much more. No one has a right to his life at someone else's expense. 
  7. Ban mandates.
  8. Ban funding by Congress for welfare recipients to have abortion (birth control), pregnancy control (condoms, pills, diaphrams), cosmetic surgery, sex changes.
  9. If it is not life threatening (e.g., erectile dysfunction), it should not be funded.
  10. Let free enterprise and free markets settle everything else.


  1. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is hereby repealed.
  2. Medicaid and Medicare recipients should be forced to use VA Hospitals. Bar Medicaid and Medicare to pay for private sector medicine/medical services.
  3. Enforce competition in medical bills insurance — interstate markets, isolated risk pools for each insured risk.


If medical bills insurance isn't suddenly cheaper, Americans will blame Republicans for breaking ObamaCare with RyanCare.

Americans can not rely upon promises of the future. Obstructionists could and likely would block future phases.

Likely, President Trump will be a one-termer and regarded as a failure for anything short of a full repeal.

RyanCare is wrong for Americans. It fails to restore the concept of insurance. It forces many Americans to overpay for risks they will never face.

If medical insurance products were designed right, people would beat a path to the doors of insurers to buy such products.

RyanCare is a turd sandwich bring served by UniParty Republicans and Mike Pence.

Read more ...

Sunday, February 19, 2017


Over the weekend, TV talking heads of the establishment's media flipped out over yet another famous Trump tweet. Many of them merely believe Trump is a rash, reckless guy. Those in the establishment media are oh so dopey.

Trump is a builder of big, expensive things. Trump is a visionary. Trump plays the long game. Trump is trying to change the culture — the codified laws and codes of conduct — of 220 million adults in the greatest turnaround attempt in the history of mankind. It is a given that establishment media would attack Trump. Trump is an outsider who is taking a wrecking ball to the establishment and the edifice they built over the last 28 years, an edifice erected on Bush Sr's kinder, gentler, New World Order. By taking out the leading lights of the establishment media, Trump is destroying the establishment media's power to conjure and shape public opinion. The one who controls public opinion is the one who holds the power to define the next culture.

Americans have let themselves become despotically-governed over the last 28 years. Americans have been obeying a power they have failed to see is of their own making. Americans have become superstitious with their habit of submission to the establishment. Americans have fallen under the spell of the agitprop of Hollywood and the propaganda of establishment news media.

President Trump is attempting to awaken in Americans their supremacy and so to treat their rulers as their agents, consciously, forcing their rulers as agents to obey the true power — popular will. When Americans awaken to their power, public opinion controlled by Americans themselves will become the controlling force of the USA.

Make no mistake. The Establishment Media are the enemy of Americans. The have lied to Americans for decades. They lied about the need for wasteful wars, which have only increased the threat of terrorism against Americans. They have lied about the need for wage-reducing illegal aliens. They have lied about the need for managed trade deals that benefit the biggest shareholders of Fortune 500 firms at the expense of workers. They have lied about the quasi-fascist Obamacare.

In his 1891 work titled The American Commonwealth, James Bryce had this to say about public opinion and its control over the USA.

Read more ...

Tuesday, February 14, 2017


The Age of Propaganda began with radio and peaked with four-network TV (CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS). The Age of Propaganda began to decline with birth of the The Age of Truth.

The Age of Truth began in late 1994 with the commercialization the Internet with the replacement of the NSFNet backbone with NAPs provided by MCI, MFS, Sprint, Pacific Bell, and Ameritech.

By the late 1990s, the rise of independent reporters began. In the 2000s, blogging platforms and media start-ups added to growth of the independent reporters and began weaken the establishment media as gatekeepers.

The appearance of Wikileaks and its publication of Iraq war-related facts further weakened the establishment media as gatekeepers. The revelations by Wikileaks during the 2016 US presidential campaign of collusion between establishment media, the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party brought to an end the Age of Propaganda.

In a desperate last ploy, establishment media tried to call the upstarts "Fake News" but that only backfired.

Their latest ploy is "post-truth world." Those with power and their establishment media turned to their wordsmith propaganda outlet, Oxford Dictionaries. The editors there decreed post-truth as their word of the year. That too will fail.

We're now in the Age of Truth living among a Truth World.
Read more ...

Tuesday, January 31, 2017


At a Big Lie ("Muslim ban") rally of dopes headed by House opposite leader, Nancy Pelosi Nancy Pelosi has revealed why the Left / Progressives / Democrats support Mohammadans (see the YouTube video below). To any clear-minded woman or man, a presidential order to enforce extant law, law that came into force from President Obama, for a temporary travel moratorium from terrorist hot spots fails to constitution a "Muslim ban."

They could give a flip about the religion of Mohammadism. With the legalization of marriage for homos, the Left / Progressives / Democrats have found their latest most icky thing that goes against Christian America — Mohammadans.

The Goebbels strategists of the Left / Progressives / Democrats know that through peer pressure, they can cleave away would-be voters from Republicans if they can make those would-be voters feel guilt or feel ashamed for siding with those who are against something being stigmatized as "icky."

Their You're-Not-One-of-Those-Who-Believe-It-Is-Icky-Too-Are-You strategy worked so well when they used homosexuals as the prop worked well enough for the Left / Progressives / Democrats to seize the White House and Congress in 2008. In short, what did it with the homos, now they are doing it with the Mohammadans.

The entire world knows that leftist ideology — socialism, communism, Marxist-Leninism — is a resounding failure when put to the test, the real world. The entire 20th century is a history lesson of oppression and mass murder of genocidal proportion done by the left.

The Left / Progressives / Democrats / Socialists / Communists have nothing else to run upon.

Read more ...

Thursday, January 19, 2017


Today, Breitbart published Blue State Blues: Barack Obama, the God That Failed, a work by Joel B. Pollak, in which Pollack describes Obama as the god of the Democrats who "had a mandate to “fundamentally transform” America, and they believed once that transformation had happened, it would be institutionally irreversible, as well as wildly popular, and guaranteed by demographic changes that immigration reformers were doing their best to hurry along."

Obama failed at everything. Obama is the first flunky president of the United States. Obama managed to preside over an eight-year economic depression, which he exacerbated at every chance.

And yes, it is true, Obama is a many-faced false god. 

✘ To feminists, Obama is Moloch to whom feminists have been sacrificing their babies in abortion.

✘ To Mohammadans, Obama is Allah to whom Mohammadans have engaged in jihad in Ft. Hood, San Bernardino, Orlando.

✘ To blacks, Obama is Mandella to whom blacks have gotten uppity with with their Black Lives Matter while the colored ghetto streets of Chicago resemble Johannesburg, South Africa.

✘ To queers, Obama is Hadrian to whom homos have engaged in their bacchanal meth-fueled queered orgies.

✘ To the anti-capitalists, Obama is Lenin to whom socialists, commies and other layabouts praised for their food stamps and Obamacare.

To browns, Obama is Huitzilopochtli to whom browns have engaged in their illegal alien invasion war against Americans.

But most of all, Obama is his own Narcissus. For eight years, Obama worshiped his own reflection. Obama fell in love with the magic negro Obama myth.

Unable to break free of his reflection, Obama stared at his reflection until everything crumbled around himself.

Read more ...

Wednesday, January 11, 2017


So it appears the executive editor of the National Geographic has decided to join the silly side of the propaganda wars in favor of the superstitious rather than on the right side of science.

I have seen the story pushed through enough vehicles that I decided the side of science must be told.

The laws of biology cannot be bent no matter how bent someone is. The only spectrum that exists is the Spectrum of Stupidity.

There are two sexes, male (XY) and female (XX). Anything else is asexual deformity — SRY gene on XX (Chapelle syndrome), XXY, XYY. Asexual deformity can not reproduce and thus are not a sex.

That is authentic biology whether or not Ivy league dummies or anyone else teaches that anymore.

No one can change biological reality. No one can alter the laws of the universe.

Legal decree and genital mutilation can not change physical reality, ever. Anyone who goes along with the delusion is as mentally ill as the dopes who believe they are the opposite sex from what their DNA says.

The only transitioning ongoing from one sex to another is making others transition to accept daylight cross-dressers and not merely those in trendy gay clubs in the dark on weekends.

Psychologists had it right awhile back when they called it transsexualism. Everyone else had it right when they called it cross-dressing homosexuality. Today, along with the phenomena of Fake News, Americans have Fake Science.

Many Americans have lost their minds supporting the delusions of those who have lost their minds.
Read more ...