TRUE DOLLAR JOURNAL

Sullum laments,

• ¹  If the underlying offense is a class A or a class B felony, then the offense of luring a child shall be considered respectively, a class C felony or class D felony.
• ²A registerable offense only if the victim is less than eighteen years of age or where the defendant has a prior conviction for a sex offense, a sexually violent offense, forcible touching or sexual abuse in the third degree or an attempt thereof even if registration was not required for the prior conviction; regardless of when the prior conviction occurred.
• ³A registerable offense only if the victim is less than seventeen years old and the offender is not the parent of the victim.
• ⁴A registerable offense only if the person patronized is in fact less than seventeen years old.
• ⁵A registerable offense unless the trial court finds that registration would be unduly harsh and inappropriate.  The Attempt version of this offense is registerable for those offenders who committed the offense on or after Sept. 23, 2011, or who previously committed the offense but were still under sentence as of that date.

You can read through apologist work by yet another Reasonoid cult handler, Lenore Skenazy , I Saw a Man Get Arrested For a Sex Crime Because He Made a Scheduling Error. In the work, Skenazy decries that legislators of Texas require Joshua Gravens to register a sex offender because Gravens fingered his sister's vagina more than once when his victim was merely eight.

Skenazy describes Gravens as a "super-articulate" man, which hardly could be the description of someone whose intellect is so hampered as  not to have known he was wrong to molest his sister when he was 12.

What is next for Reasonoids? Are they going to come out their closets to support NAMBLA under a bogus free association argument?





You can glance at the age of consent laws of the various states, none of which seem unreasonable.





On a side note, 42% of all millionaires living in New York state live in the Manhattan borough of New York City. It looks like Manhattan millionaires have bought the legislators they needed to keep heinous child molesters out of Manhattan.

Here are a few of my takes on the progressive liberals masquerading libertarians at Reason.com:

• GO FREE-RANGERS GO! FREE-RANGERS AND REASON.COM
• WHOA DUDE, WHAT? LEGALIZING ISN'T LIBERTARIAN? PASS ME THE BONG. GOO GOO GOO JOOB.
• REASONOIDS OF REASON.COM, AMERICA'S CRYPTO-REPUBLICANS

One last note, because of my comments written in response to Reasonoid cultie handler Shikha Dalmia's recent Reason.com article on Millennials and legal pot, detailing how legalization isn't decriminalization and thus legalization, which Reason.com handlers champion, isn't libertarian, I've been censored at Reason.com

All of my comments on countless articles have been removed by the technical staff at Reason.com while comments remain by scores of others on those same articles.

So much for the "free minds" slogan Reasonoids at Reason.com peddle.

Reasonoids at Reason.com give libertarianism a bad rep. In short, they don't understand the doctrine at all and thus are not adherents to it. The closet from which Reasonoids should emerge is the Rockefeller Republican / (Bill) Clinton New Democrat closet in which they hide while masquerading as libertarians.

I might have more to say about my blacklisted censorship at Reason.com soon.