TRUE DOLLAR JOURNAL

So in the aftermath of the shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church  in Charleston, South Carolina, in which nine Americans were killed, many opportunists of mainstream media have wasted no time to exploit the event for political purposes. While most have called for gun bans in violation of the United States Constitution, many have done something far worse.

Stupidly, many are calling the criminal act an act of terrorism. Sadly, the president of the National Association of Colored People, Cornell William Brooks, in a thoughtless, reactionary manner said the incident is "an act of racial terrorism."

To believe Dylann Roof is a terrorist and to remain logically consistent, one must believe Adam Lanza was terrorist. One must believe James Holmes is a terrorist.

An ill-in-mind shooter who kills more than one during one incident isn't a terrorist. Those who claim this shooting as terrorism have engaged in rhetoric of the worst kind.
Terrorism means living by killing civilians in efforts to get civilians to pressure law givers into changing their policy or to get civilians to rise up and overthrow their law givers.

How is killing some Americans who happen to be black going to get blacks to rise up against law givers and force them to change their polices toward blacks?

Here are notable, actual terrorist attacks:

• The Palestine Liberation Organization Muslims who murdered Israeli athletes at the 1972 Summer Games in Munich were terrorists.
• The 1995 Tokyo Subway sarin gas attacks that killed 12 Japanese done by Aum Shinrikyo were terrorists.
• The 9/11 (2001) Al-Qaeda Muslim Saudi Arabian and Egyptian hijackers who murdered over 3,000 Americans were terrorists.

For any act to be racist, such an act would need to stop anyone from a claimed group from obtaining work or entering into contracts. That is the correct definition of racism. All other ways to talk of racism is done by racists themselves to mask their own agendas.

The biggest promoters of racism in exchange for power are politicians. Racism is a political doctrine. Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns anyone into monsters as they join groups.
Jim Crow laws were the misdeeds of racist law givers. The Dred Scott vs Sanford (1856) decision by U.S. Supreme Court robes was the misdeed of racist judges. Pace v. Alabama (1883) was yet another racist decision by the U.S. Supreme Court judges as was Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

Foolishly, many Americans revere U.S. Supreme court judges as demigods.

U.S. Supreme Court legal "scholars" universally hated Asians in the 20th century. In five major racist rulings, the revered Supreme Court robes ruled against the individualism of Americans who had Chinese or Japanese ancestry — Ozawa v. United States (1922), Korematsu v. United States (1944), Lum v. Rice (1927), Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), Korematsu v. United States (1944).

Law givers of Americans, especially those of the U.S. Congress are the chief instigators of racism in America. Congress engages in discrimination through laws that establish agencies to support all kinds of racism — subsidy for women-only businesses, education subsidy for so-called minorities, and so forth.

The biggest racists in America today are those organized groups such as the NAACP, NOW, Act Up!, and La Raza, each of which push for privileged privileges like quotas and subsidies.

Racism results in doling political privilege to those in favored groups at the expense of defenseless individuals who fail to belong to any organized group.  If any individual dare speak up about the duty being imposed upon him so political privileges as rights can get conferred to those of favored groups, that individual gets labeled as a racist by those winning the privileges.

Why does anyone seek political privilege? That is the real problem.

It is sad but predictable that those of mankind with political agendas go to great lengths through political theater to deceive the gullible and convince the gullible of all manners of things.

Every individual has the capacity of living by the Law of Love — do to others and loving one's neighbor as you would want others to love you.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. Individuals who join groups lose themselves and becoming cogs of the group, one of the mob, the crowd, who do wicked misdeeds in the name of advancing the group. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Everywhere you go, you can find the ultimate group, one based on territory and forced membership. It is to this group that all other groups appeal for support and protection. This ultimate group is forged by law givers, of course.

Since the recorded history of mankind, there has been no greater force of evil the earth other than that of law givers. The men and women of governments — politicians and bureaucrats — are the true mass murderers and manipulators of minds as they dole out crumbs of welfare in exchange for power.